The policy explains source provenance, author responsibility, corrections and the independent status of the project.
What the document governs
- Official pages, the T&C and account evidence have priority.
- Individual CPA and Hybrid offers are not presented as universal terms.
- Each page carries authorship and a review date.
Versions and corrections
- Separate facts from recommendations.
- Do not promise earnings.
- Disclose the site's independent status.
- Accept corrections supported by a primary source.
Source priority
When the T&C change, the author updates the page, records the review date and archives the primary source.
Responsibilities
A marketing claim cannot be published as fact without evidence.
Contact
A correction is complete when the copy, review date and primary source have all been updated.
How corrections work
The author separates verified facts from examples and recommendations. A reviewer opens the primary source, checks figures and dates, and records the review. When the T&C changes, the page and correction log are updated. The site does not promise income or present an individual rate as available to every partner.
Sources and review date
For “How this independent site verifies information”, the editorial team reviewed the official RioAff website, current T&C and available dashboard evidence. Last reviewed: 2026-08-06.
Owner and publisher
These public details were provided by the site owner. Editorial questions go to the published email; RioAff account matters must use the program's official channels.
How material is reviewed
Each page separates official facts from editorial interpretation. Facts are checked against source documents and calculations are repeated by a second reviewer.
Material corrections include an update date and a new content version where the change is material.
Frequently asked questions
Which sources receive priority in editorial review?
Official pages, the T&C and account evidence have priority. This reflects public terms; account-specific rates and restrictions still require confirmation.
How are verified facts separated from recommendations?
Separate facts from recommendations. This reflects public terms; account-specific rates and restrictions still require confirmation.
What triggers a fresh review of a published page?
A marketing claim cannot be published as fact without evidence. This reflects public terms; account-specific rates and restrictions still require confirmation.